Can "Socialist" Sanders Deliver and Why He Has not Fully Explained His "No" Vote on the Immigration Bill in 2007?
A vital maxim for those who make decisions for the rest of us in the public square, “Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable — the art of the next best.” Indeed, it is not about what you want. Of course, if Senator Sanders has a red army ready to go into Washington and ready to shoot against those who do not see for a need to recalibrate America’s society, then this vital maxim can be utterly ignored.
Bernie Sanders is a child of the 1960s, a decade of political turmoil and social change. He has struggled all his life endeavoring to bring heaven to earth to working-class folks. He would like to eradicate income inequality, to curb corporate power, and to provide access to healthcare to everyone. If we could enact these proposals into laws, then we could have a perfect civil society, Sanders reasons.
Senator Sanders has been in government for the last forty years. He has served in both houses of Congress, and significant legislative accomplishments have eluded him. Bernie Sanders, in the 1970s, settled in Vermont. In 1981 he became mayor of the city of Burlington. In 1986, he ran for governor as an independent and lost to Peter Smith. In 1990, Sanders challenged Smith again, and with the NRA’s support, he finally defeated Smith for a House of Representatives seat. He descended in Washington, and he had no allies. He was viewed as a gadfly who just likes to read anti-corporate pronouncements on the floor. In 2006 he won a seat in the United States Senate and had won re-election twice.
Senator Sanders deserves credit for presenting progressive policy platforms, in the 2016’s presidential election. It would have been considered inconceivable back in 2016 that a self-described “democratic socialist (watch the video here)” be viewed in 2020 as a real contender for the Democratic nomination. Sanders ‘ vision sparked a national conversation, and four years later, we have seen how mainstream and moderate democratic candidates embraced Sanders’ proposals.
I am on board with some of Sanders’s policy proposals, and I would like them implemented. However, the current political system requires a massive formation of coalitions. Yes, Sanders will have to work with crazy Republicans, including “Moscow Mitch” in the Senate. Based on Senator Sanders’ thin legislative record, I do not see how Sanders could do this, “compromising” is a word that never made it to his lexicon.
In 2016, one of the editorial boards of a major newspaper asked him how he was going to persuade and to work with Republicans once elected president. Some supporters were flabbergasted by his inadequate response. Here it is what he said verbatim of what he would have said to Republicans, “Hey, Mitch, look out the window. There’s a million young people out there now. Moreover, they are following politics in a way they did not before. If you want to vote against this legislation, go for it. However, you and some of your friends will not have your seats next election.” What a silly and simplistic response! We do not have that type of robust democracy where people take it to the street. Mitch will probably laugh on his face.
The power to create public policy resides in Congress. Any candidate running for the presidency knows that, and these individuals also understand that presidents do not have the ability to create policy. They will have to work with the leadership of the two houses in Congress. If one of these two houses is controlled by the opposition, nothing will get done. So when a candidate tells what you want to hear, “Free Tuition,” “Universal Childcare,” or $1000.00 a month-free cash, they are playing you for a sucker.
Case in point, “Moscow Mitch,” and Barack Obama, Senator Mitch McConnell, did not even hold hearings for Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court to replace Justice Scalia. He nominated Merrick Garland, who was the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Those President Medals of Freedom came handy for Obama, once Republicans took over the Senate, Obama started giving Medals out. He spent his last two years of his presidency in these ceremonial events.
President Obama had both houses of Congress being controlled by Democrats during his first year in office. He could not even get Obamacare right. Let that sink in for a moment. Even his detractors agree that Obama was highly intellectual and violently charming and persuasive and yet he could not get much done. A basic concept of separation of power at play here.
In 2015, Sanders understood that running as a third-party candidate; he would have no chance, hence in 2016, he joined the democratic party. Yes, the “neo-liberal democratic party” that sold out the poor and the corporate political party that his supporters grotesquely disdain. Bernie Sanders always ran as an independent until 2016 when he switched and became a democrat. Once his presidential campaign ended in 2016, he went back to being an independent. And in 2018, he won re-election for his US Senate seat as an independent. This is the very reason why democratic leadership in the democratic party has no love for the man. They would do whatever they can to hinder him from winning the nomination.
Moreover, there is that immigration reform still needed. As one who would like to see immigration reform for the million undocumented people in this country, I found this very troubling. In 2007 Sanders opposed the Kennedy-McCain immigration bill. I have problems seeing Sanders very casually telling a xenophobic and racist Lou Dobbs on this video (watch the video here), how immigrants hurt Americans for depressing wages and taking opportunities away from Americans. This was what Sanders roughly told him, I do not” know why we need millions of people to be coming into this country as guest workers who will work for lower wages than American workers and drive wages down even lower than they are now.” His lame excuse that it was all about “corporate greed” and concerns for guest workers programs was a facade. He did not even stop Dobbs from attacking immigrants. For those of you who do not know who Lou Dobbs is, Google him.
Regarding a single-payer system or “Medicare for All” and that since other countries are doing it, we should do it as well. No arguments there, yes, we should do it, but Sanders’ current simplistic plan of action will not pan out. The challenge here is not how much it cost, but how do we persuade all power bases in Washington to do it differently. If one wants to have some sense of this, carefully study the Obamacare. Insurance companies flexed their muscles and almost killed it. Americans are way too busy to engage in this sort of civic engagement. Also, this vision of a single-payer system miserably failed in the Sanders’ state of Vermont. Yes, if you want to help Americans, one should start in his own state.
Senator Sanders has a long way to go, for starters, his crowds need more people of color. In 2016, he displayed a lack of ability to bring people of color to his “movement.” Bringing more Latinos under his tent doesn’t mean to hire Latinos or Blacks as staffers. He has done a terrible job doing that with these Latino consultants both in 2016 and 2019 in Vegas and L.A. These consultants have given many corporate politicians to LA.
Finally, I am not sure if revolutions start at presidential elections and being led by a man who has been in government for way too long. Nonetheless, the man has to be given credit for animating millions of young and progressive people, and that was good for whatever is left of this democracy.
Thank you for reading.
P.S. I am neither part of the “democratic establishment” nor I am part of the “corporate democratic conspiracy” that Sanders’ supporters accuse people of for disagreeing with the the Senator. My piece about is analytical in nature and it is not intended to be anything more.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Photo Credit. Phote used in this piece came form photo stock.
Sources used.
“Becoming Bernie: The 6 Chapters Of Sanders’ Life.”NPR Politics, 3 Nov. 2015.
Cillizza, Chris. “5 reasons to be skeptical of Bernie Sanders’ 2020 bid.” CNN, 19 Feb. 2019.
“For all her faults, Hillary Clinton is vastly better prepared than Bernie Sanders for the presidency.” Editorial. Los Angeles. Los Angeles Times 13 May 2016.
Goldstein, Amy. “Why Vermont’s single-payer effort failed and what Democrats can learn from it.” The Washington Post 29 April 20 19.
Krieg, Gregory and Ryan Nobles. “Bernie Sanders makes the case for democratic socialism as Trump attacks and moderate Democrats worry.” CNN Politics 12 June 2019.
Yglesias, Matthew. “What Bernie Sanders told Lou Dobbs in 2007 about why he opposed the Kennedy-McCain immigration bill.” Vox 12 Feb 2016.
The main point of this article is a refutation of the possibility that Bernie Sanders will be an adequate president of the United States. This article is very biased but does make reasonable assumptions as to why he is not fit to be commander in chief. In the article, Chamba states that “Bernie Sanders is a child of the 1960s, a decade of political turmoil and social change” (Sanchez). If anything, I believe that this point argues the case that he is fit to be a president. For anyone who has seen the last 60 years of America and has witnessed great change and movement in the society would be a great leader because our country currently needs a new type of leadership. This presidential candidate has been in government for forty years and has even served in Congress. I know that Sanders has been deemed as a socialist, but our country needs a blend between socialism and capitalism. The United States has over 400 billionaires. Experts say anywhere between 50 and 80 billion dollars would end homelessness. This problem of unequal distribution of wealth and property will be the reason why this great nation will fall. History tells us that the greed of great nations will be detrimental to their longevity. Someone like Bernie may be our saving grace from demise.
This article gave me a more clear idea of who Sanders is, and what he has done.
Sanders, in my opinion, thinks he could do a lot and that’s good because it will help us a lot. But it’s easy to say ” I’m going to do this for you guys” but it’s hard to actually work on it. It’s hard to believe at times because presidents say they are going to do this but end up doing nothing. Thi article is good shows who Sanders is and what he has done.
Bernie may have good intentions but in politics that can easily backfire.
Reading the article, you start to see what kind of person Sanders is. He says, free tuition for all, universal childcare, etc. but Sander knows in doing this he attracts the young people of America. Most college (not every single college student) appeal to socialism or even communism and praise it as a utopia. I can see why democrats aren’t really fond of him, he shows that hes only really into fot himself.
As an immigrant myself it’s hard to hear that Candidate Sanders said those things about immigration it goes out to show how ignorant we are. It is sad to know that sometimes the people vote because of what we heard them saying to the people without really searching for what these candidates really stand for this article gave me a different opinion about Sanders although I will go and do more research on my own to inform those close to me that can vote so they can be informed and make up their own opinion.
I somewhat agree with this but I also wanted to add that he wanted the best for his community and had many YOUNG followers surprisingly due to the lack of interest most young people have in politics.
Why should we do the ‘Medicare for All’? From my understanding, I had read on the New York Times that Medicare for All will affect many people’s private insurances and slowly start helping the people. As in, this policy will not take affect right away. It will take some time for the people to receive the benefits of this policy.
I agree with the writer mostly. Senator Sanders is just giving a bait for the people with the “Free Things”. Because he is Socialist. I am disagree if we change our politics to Socialism. If he intends become a socialist to make an equality on financial and no gap between the rich and the poor, in the end we will all become poor and no rich. It is the rich people who helps the poor. Rich people pay more taxes from their income or property, the taxes that they paid is allocated to the people who can’t pay intuition. That is the purpose of the diversities.
I believe that he might have a good chance. I feel he has been a politician for so many years, he has a good chance. I feel even though he hasn’t been taken seriously, buff he had been running for many years. Very consistent.
I agree with Sanchez that Senator Sanders believes in many socialist ideas that would benefit Americans, if he could find a realistic approach to accomplish them.
The article pointed something interesting which I didn’t realize before. Presidential candidate usually say they’ll implement a lot of policy once they are president knowing that is not under their control. Bernie Sanders isn’t the expectation. Chamba said in his article that Sanders says things like free tuition or universal healthcare, but as president he won’t have this kind of power. The main focus of the article was to say if Sander has the possibility of being an adequate commander in chief. In my opinion I think he would be very successful because he doesn’t seem like the persuasive type that can convince the opposition.
This article helped me learn more about the political backgrounds of Obama and Sanders. I agree with the author of this article, Chamba Sanchez’s opinion regarding the promises Bernie Sanders lives by in his campaigns. I don’t see how any of his proposals can get passed if he is elected President when policies filter through both houses of congress before they are sent to the president to sign off on making it a policy. Worse luck both houses are being unevenly filled with inexperienced members whom favor the right side.
From my understanding, Bernie is promising all these proposals in order to win over the low income working class populations votes. Sad to relate that he is following the shadows of Obama when he was President. Obama promised and persuaded his supporters he was distracted from holding up his end of the bargain. As will Bernie if he is elected into office because of the lack of democratic supporters seated in the houses of congress. I’m assuming this to be the reason for Bernie’s lack of explanation of his “no” vote on the immigration bill of 2007. Bernie didn’t want to be associated with the word “socialist” therefore he neglected to explain his vote against the bill. He didn’t want to jeopardize any possible votes he did have in congress.
What it sounds like is, Bernie Sanders is willing to jump on whatever bandwagon will further his career.
I agree it will be complicated for Senator Sanders to win the democratic nomination. The Senator has ran as an Independent throughout his political career and as such makes it hard for the democratic party to embrace him as their candidate.
I appreciate Chamba for clearly laying out Bernie Sanders to be me he didn’t seem fit to be the next president due to his age. But after reading this article and reading Bernies experience I see Bernie can be equipped to be the next President.